There are many faults with traditional grading methods. Relying solely on letter grades can actually be more harmful than helpful when it comes to student learning, empowering and engaging all students, and measuring growth. These are some of my favorite quotes from the discussion that summarize the problems with traditional grading systems:
Traditional grades are often subjective.
@gfred33: The differences of grading between teachers is so huge, how can the grades really inform anyone of anything?
Traditional grades are often meaningless.
@spedteacher: (Students) often can't really explain what a D is without reference to a C and B. All meaningless to me.
Traditional grades are often restrictive.
@gfred33: Grades keep some students from taking risks and others from seeking challenge.
Traditional grades are often misguided.
@whatedsaid: I don't believe grades motivate students to learn. They motivate students to get grades.
Traditional grades are often unrealistic.
@Zweibz7: YES! How do we assess IRL? RT @edtechsteve: When was the last time someone got a letter grade for something they did after college?
Traditional grades are often invalid.
@tomwhitby: If a kid is workin @ 100% of ability and is failin do we grade on acheivement or ability?
Traditional grades do not take into account the needs of 21st century learners.
@edtechsteve: Redefining 21st cent success as being able to be a creative/flexible problem solver throws a wrench into grading

0 Comments